
I was thinking of writing a post about why I eat meat but you know, I eat meat because that is my choice. I tried a vegan diet for a year, I tried a vegetarian diet for two. What feels best for my body and mind is to eat mostly plants, then eggs, dairy products, and small infrequent portions of meat. I also love exploring regional cuisine of Mexico with meat I have raised, processed and cooked. It is a respectful tribute to the animal and my heritage. It is one of the most natural and sacred cycles in my daily life.
The question I’d rather have answered is why do others, who choose not to eat meat, feel they should proselytize?
It is my philosophy that if you provide people with a choice and respectful, compassionate dialogue they will choose what is right for them- and that may change. Point is, people make true change when they have free will. Not when they are being forced. I do not disparage people for their food choices. That would alienate me from my own family. Instead, I provide a choice, share with love and enjoyment and let them choose. It has created loving dialogue and change.
I am all about the freedom to choose your path. In fact, I recently enjoyed a tasty lunch at Flacos a vegan taqueria in Berkeley, CA. Tuesdays they offer $1 flautas with a face melting hot sauce (love it). Ironically, I feel guilty when I eat these flautas. They are made of highly processed nonorganic soy product that’s been shipped from Taiwan (I know the vendor they get it from) AND deep fried. This is an example of food that is neither environmentally appropriate or healthy but still vegan. This got me thinking about the injustice of being attacked for my food choices and the irony of forceful tactics employed by people who claim to be the most righteous and compassionate for their own politics around animals.
I’m reading Hal Herzog’s book Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat. It offers a well documented, credible and insightful perspective on human animal relationships. He has included a section on some of the violence of the animal rights movement.
World history offers a vivid example of a world leader that was a vegetarian and an avid animals right activist who also believed their own moral and ethical beliefs should be integrated into their society, at all costs. He believed other cultural practices to be a defect of human nature.
This was of course Adolf Hitler. A fact of history carefully documented by professor, author and researcher Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich.
It is little known that in 1933, the German government enacted the world’s most comprehensive animal protection legislation. Among other things the law forbade any unnecessary harm to animals, banned the inhumane treatment of animals in production of movies, and outlawed the use of dogs in hunting. It banned docking the tails and ears of dogs without anesthesia, the force feeding of fowl, and the inhumane killing of farm animals. Adolf Hitler signed the legislation on November, 24th 1933. On a 1933 radio show, Hermann Goring announced that he would “commit to concentration camps those who think they can continue to treat animals as property.” In 1936, the German government dictated that fish had to be anesthetized before slaughter and that lobsters in restaurants had to be killed swiftly. In 1942, Jews were forbidden to keep pets (excerpt taken from Some We Love, Some We Hate Some We Eat).
The vegan activists who attack, invalidate, and work to eliminate the cultural practices of others may want to reflect on this.